More Risk, Less Reward
The issue
Tracking error rose after 2020 across core US large-cap managers. The usual read is that managers took more active risk. The decomposition suggests a different story: more systematic and factor exposure, not more idiosyncratic stock selection. Managers who took the extra risk were generally not paid for it.
Why allocators should care
A higher tracking-error number does not tell you whether a manager is making independent stock bets or renting the same factor tilts the benchmark already owns. In a concentrated, mega-cap-heavy index, those are not the same thing.
What we did
Analysis of roughly 900 core US large-cap managers with tracking-error decomposition and peer comparison. Companion short note and an interactive competitor explorer for the sales team.
Takeaway
Active risk is a scarce resource. Over this period in US Large Cap, paying for more tracking error did not reliably buy better outcomes. The client conversation shifts from defending active management to matching the form of active risk to market structure.