Derived, Borrowed, Learned

Trackrevised 2026-09-08

The question this track follows

Every useful computation depends on structure the problem already has. The three essays here are about three different places that structure can come from, and about what happens at the edge where it runs out.

Derived. From Smooth to JaggedEssayFrom Smooth to JaggedHow mathematics grew a new tool each time reality posed a problem the existing math could not solve, from Taylor series to the Fourier transform, stochastic calculus, fractal geometry, and rough paths, ending with a personal encounter with Benoit Mandelbrot and its bearing on reading markets. follows mathematics growing a new tool each time reality proved rougher than the last one could describe: Taylor series, Fourier analysis, Itô calculus, fractal geometry, rough paths. Structure is derived from first principles, and the frontier is still moving.

Borrowed. The Resolution of RealityEssayThe Resolution of RealityA primer on quantum computing: how physical law replaces brute-force search, why the advantage depends on how native the problem is to the machine, and where hybrid classical-quantum architectures fit. is a primer on quantum computing, and its central claim is that a quantum computer's advantage depends on how native the problem is to the machine. At the native end, the machine and the molecule obey the same physics and the modeling step nearly disappears. Structure is borrowed from nature.

Learned. From Prediction to AgencyEssayFrom Prediction to AgencyA draft essay on frontier language models: each stage in their development answered a limit hit by the previous one, and each answer changed what a model is. It ends with the question the companion essays set up: whether a learned model of human behavior could become a substrate for markets, and why reflexivity puts a ceiling on that., on frontier language models, follows a different arc: each stage in their development answered a limit hit by the previous one, and the models now learn structure from data where nobody can derive it and nothing in nature computes it. It ends with the question the first two essays set up: whether a learned model of human behavior could ever become a borrowed substrate for markets, and why ReflexivityNoteSeedReflexivityA model of a market changes the market. Soros's reflexivity, the Lucas critique, and Goodhart's law are three statements of the same limit, and it is the one way markets are permanently harder than chemistry: molecules do not read the paper. puts a ceiling on that hope.

Where the track currently stops

The third essay is a draft. Its notes on individual labs carry last_reviewed dates and will go stale; the concept notes will not. Read the essays for the argument and the notes for the parts of the argument I am still learning.

How to read it

The reading order below alternates essays and notes. Each essay is complete on its own; the notes fill in the concepts an essay mentions but does not have room to develop. The The Structure GradientNoteSeedThe Structure GradientComputational advantage depends on how much structure a problem has and where the structure comes from: isomorphic (the problem is physics), structural (hidden mathematical regularity), or generic (nothing to exploit). Derived, borrowed, or learned. note is the shared vocabulary and is worth reading first.